Bailing Out The Auto Industry...
I find this to be a really interesting topic, because on one hand you have politicians attempting to take responsibility for economic collapse, but simultaneously exercising complete misjudgment of this industry's marketability in the future.
While the jobs of Canadians in these manufacturing jobs are absolutely essential to the well being of all Canadians in the short-term, I think it is important that we look at what exactly it is we're trying to save. Obviously, this recession hasn't left many survivors, but out of all of the industries to "bail out", it seems like this is one that has done the least to adapt in terms of its concern for the environment or increase its efficiency. (That is, north-American auto makers). Should this uncooperative and often ignorant behaviour deserve fiscal stimulus from the Federal Government?
It is evident that our entire economic system is in need of reform. As Paul Hawken outlines in his book "The Ecology of Commerce", we've failed to make the connection between our relationship to profit and the environment around us. I think regardless of how many of these necessary changes we are able to make in the future (and hopefully near future), certain market principles are almost assumed to exist for as long as the global economy is in place. In the United States and Canada (The U.S. more so), one of these remaining principles will certainly be the free market. Granted, this entire term and concept is loaded with a whole bunch of meanings, but when I say this, I am making reference to our basic economic platform of allowing businesses to compete to provide better products and services for consumers. In this case, the bail-out of the auto industry is an evasion of this fundamental principle, and regardless of how much money that the Government of Canada, or the United States government pours into it, this will not make the auto-industry any more competitive. In other words, and make this very clear--though the bail-outs of the auto-industry will protect short-term employment, it will do absolutely nothing to ensure that the demand for these largely inefficient automobiles and irresponsible organizations that manufacture them will be there when the economy recovers.
As our leader Elizabeth May mentioned in her blog recently, in great challenge there is also great opportunity. In the case of the manufacturing sector and particularly the auto-industry in Canada; I think it is very, very important that the Government is carefully selective as to what industries they invest in, and put the long term interests of this country ahead of the inevitable progression where jobs of antiquity quickly become obsolete.
- Anthony D Rosborough's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Blogs are personal opinions, and may not reflect the position of the Green Party of Canada. For official party policy please visit the policy and press release sections.
Recent Comments
- Theodore Tadeson | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- Bram Kivenko | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- David Barclay | 09-Feb-2012
- 1 of 2171
- ››





Comments
Bailout
It is my opinion that the current "economic crisis" (remember how Harper the economist said during the election everything was fine and there might be buying opportunities on the stock market ? . . .how his tune has changed) was caused not by the credit problem but by high oil prices. In my opinion the price of oil had become disconnected from principles of supply and demand by commodity market speculators. If you look at the previous big crash of the 80's it was also preceded by high oil prices and a housing boom. I think that the tight credit markets were caused by collapse of the housing market which were in turn caused by the enourmous concentration of consumer disposable income into basic services and energy. People couldn't expand businesses or buy bigger TV's etc etc when they had to spend the money for those items on gas and heating fuel. I think the whole recession has been caused by unjustifiable rapid increase in oil prices. The recent plummet of oil prices is now removing the portion of the price caused by the speculators and returning it back to the proper supply/demand price.
What has this to do with the auto bailout? As has been stated in numerous sources the auto sector was dependent on favourable tax breaks for SUV's to protect domestic car sales for years and failed to forsee the high oil prices and it's impact on their business. I think that the bailout packages being introduced will not protect the domestic car makers from normal market forces referred to above. My hope is they keep the industry afloat long enough for the "Big Three" to perfect and introduce their own environmentally friendly cars and therefore have a better chance of competing long term. The return of unspeculative oil pricing is the largest incentive that exists for the car makers. Consumers have short memories and it remains to be seen if they keep in mind the recent high energy prices and stay away from gas guzzlers or anticipate the return of 1.25/liter gas (and these prices will return without question) when making their next car purchase. Make no mistake I have no sympathy for the big shots at the top of the car companies. My concern is for the auto workers and in particlar their children who could be subjected to uncertainty and poverty if their parents jobs are lost. I therefore support some kind of stop gap bailout to buy time for the auto companies to change their ways. . but grudgingly. . . as I know half the problem was theirs and half the shocking and unjustified escalation of oil prices by oil industry profiteers.