Herding green cats
"It's like herding cats!" - That's one of the favourite sayings at my house where we have 6-year-old twin daughters and my wife runs a home daycare business.
If you've never heard the expression "herding cats" just watch this wonderful ad from a few years ago by consulting firm EDS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8
Imagine trying to take a mob of cats and herd them like cattle, getting them all running in roughly the same direction to arrive at the right place at the right time. Not a task for faint of heart or weak of will.
Managing a political party is a lot like herding cats. You're basically dealing with a horde of highly opinionated, independently-minded individualists each with their own ideas on how things should work and what's the best way to do things. Somehow you've got to get them all moving and working together if you're going to arrive at your intended destination: getting elected. At the same time you've got to respect the independence and free spirit of the individuals in your herd. Good party leaders have to be good cat herders.
The big risk is the fine line between being a cat herder and being a shepherd. Harper and Ignatieff are shepherds. They treat their party members like sheep - dumb animals with no independent will or individuality. They drive them and employ party enforcers to act as sheepdogs, nipping the heels of those who stray. The new code-phrase for this in the Conservative and Liberal folds is Party Discipline. It a phrase I quickly tired of hearing prior to my eventual flight from Iggy's sheep pen. The result of Liberal/Conservative Party Discipline, of course, is their MPs, candidates and party members lose their cat-ish ability to react quickly and think on their feet.
So why this little dissertation today on cats and political parties? I'm glad you asked.
Yesterday I received, as most of you no doubt did, the announcement that nominations are open for the 308 individuals who will carry the Green banner into the next election. Now the wind has carried rumours to my sensitive little political ears that:
a) there has been some urging from Green central to the riding associations to get this over and done with reasonable dispatch, and;
b) in response some riding associations are grumbling about this annoying intrusion on their grassroots democratic freedoms
Herding cats.
The riding associations are of course right. Having Party HQ twist their arms into speedier nominations is an intrusion on their individual democratic freedom. Likewise me ordering my daughters to eat their veggies infringes on their individual freedom. It's still good for them.
When a party has its candidates nominated well in advance of the election the candidates can begin forming their campaign teams, the campaign HQ can begin establishing the national campaign logistical frameworks and working with the candidates and their teams on strategy, messaging, logistics, etc. In short the entire party has more time get get prepared so when the election actually comes, the whole party apparatus is ready to spring into action like a well-oiled machine. It's the key to victory.
In the last election Stephane Dion's Liberals were caught without a full slate of nominated candidiates. It was symptomatic of the larger disorganization and lack of election readiness within that party which strongly contributed to the electoral thrashing they received. The key to Liberal and Conservative victories throughout their histories has been effective organization.
This is the lesson the Green Party needs to learn from its opponents. I am given to understand this kind of election preparedness has not been a Green Party hallmark in past elections. Perhaps, as with the grumbing over the push to complete nominations, it stems from a fear of loss of grassroots freedom. Nobody wants the Green Party to succumb to Igg/Harper-style Party Discpline. What everyone needs to realize is you can have organized party discipline without having Party Discpline. It is possible for the cats to move as a herd without turning into sheep.
The next election could come at any time. Believe it. And believe as well that it is absolutely essential for the future of the Green Party as a credible force in Canadian politics that we, at the bare minimum, hold our gains from the last election. Accomplishing that means getting organized. It means that, as difficult as it feels, the cats are going to have to give up a little piece of their autonomy, listening to and accepting some direction from the cat herders.
- Kieran Green's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Blogs are personal opinions, and may not reflect the position of the Green Party of Canada. For official party policy please visit the policy and press release sections.
Recent Comments
- Theodore Tadeson | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- Bram Kivenko | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- David Barclay | 09-Feb-2012
- 1 of 2171
- ››





Comments
great post
I've been saying this for years now... although not as eloquently. :)
I especially like:
So true. And fundamental to our success.
---
Matthew Clarke
Senor Web Developer
---
Matthew Clarke
Senor Web Developer
The Ultimate Destination and How We Get There
Two quick comments (because that’s all I have time for):
"Sudbury" Steve May
1) Inherent in your blog is the assumption that the ultimate destination where the cats need to end up is one we are all in agreement on, that being getting MP’s elected. While I agree with you on that being the destination, there are others in this Party who do not. When we’re not even sure where we need to go, it becomes a lot more difficult to herd.
2) I know that much of the grumbling about the candidate selection process has had to do with the constitutionality, along with a change in the rules for this process. I suggest that if you, and everyone else, look into this more before coming to the quick conclusion that this is all "for the good of the Party". While I agree with you that the outcomes are excellent (having nominated candidates everywhere, for all of the good reasons you’ve identified), it’s the getting there which is problematic. And frankly, it didn’t need to be this way. I suspect that the new rules will be reviewed after the current process plays itself out, so that we can all avoid a similar situation in the future.
"Sudbury" Steve May
RE: "where we need to go".
RE: "where we need to go". I feel compelled to note that we are receiving the funds from taxpayers in order to be a political party. I.e. run candidates, get votes & get elected. We can do all kinds of interesting things in pursuit of that goal--but that must be the ultimate goal if we are to look taxpayers in the eye.
---
Matthew Clarke
Senor Web Developer
---
Matthew Clarke
Senor Web Developer
Animal Magnetism - Franz Mesmer
This party exists in its current form due to a Bill called C-24, a great deal of fear about the future and the strength of the "Green" brand. Add in the demise of the Progressive Conservatives and the punishment of the Liberals and you have the conditions that have led to a "miraculous" growth spurt. In 2003, the party had annual revenues of about $250,000. Today we have more than 10 times this amount. In the 2008 Election we spent over $2,800,000 (according to the filed report) - in less than 6 weeks.
Based on the actions of the party over the past 5 years we can see certain things. We most certainly want to make sure we have 308 candidates for general elections (more or less). We most certainly want to maximize our subsidy and our contributions (individual donations).
Rob Brooks
Hull-Aylmer
herding cats without the sheep gene
Re: Herding green cats ; since 1983 I've been involved with 3 federal ridings with the Greens. In the earliest you could hear the territorial hissy fit down the block from our meeting. And the smell! I won't name names but note we've come a long way since then, baby: the 2 males then scrapping it out are now older & wiser. My current riding has a very dedicated core of grass-roots shakers, responsible no doubt to some degree for relatively high results for Greens in recent elections. Constitutionally though, notification wasn't properly made for board elections held post Oct 14th, fact of which was personally dismaying. Expediency at the cost of inclusion? 7, or even 13,% is not our goal. The bigger tent necessary to hold our burgeoning numbers will have to be up to code, welcoming and well designed for orderly quick expansion. Broods of young cats are being weaned from an entirely nouveau soup of toxic food substitutes, having been raised in another, more deadly, atmosphere of gases, are now coming of age in an altogether cynical age of political ennui - strays of various pedigree. But crisis is opportunity (even Harper can quote the Confucian pictogram). These young cats are our future leaders, our country's next ministers of peace and social justice. Let them be herd.
My thoughts on your insightful herding green cats post, Kieran. By word association (obliquely & pre- be-bop concerning the coolness of cats) I googled my way to a tribute to a great speech made by a Canadian radical hero with a deep green conservative bent. My apologies to 'Today's NDP' who may believe they are still the champions of Mouseland - for your enjoyment:
"I won’t quote the full text of Mouseland so as not to plagiarize [Tommy] Douglas's work, but you can... ...listen to the audio version. My synopsis of Mouseland is that government (Canadian, American, whichever) is conducted by cats, for the benefit of cats, and we mice are pretty much left to fend for ourselves.
The cats, in case you hadn’t guessed, are the 10 percent of the population at the top of the economic and social ladder; the ones we call the “wealthy elite.” In America, they currently hold 90 percent of the wealth. The situation is similar, if not quite so blatant, in every developed country in the world, and (marginally?) worse in so-called "third world" dictatorships.
Today, as I write this, the stock market is imploding from New York to London, the tremors being felt as far away as Asia. The culprits are the cats, for whose benefit other fat-cats (known as the Fed) have voted in favor of cat food (bailouts, conservatorship) versus mouse food (affordable gasoline, housing and comestibles). As long as the cats are in power, expect the living conditions of mice to deteriorate.
French writer Hervé Kempf (How the Rich Are Destroying the Earth) calls these cats, “the global sect of greedy gluttons” and their forms of government oligarchies. They see, in the current social unrest caused by their excessive greed and attitude of entitlement, a threat to their privileged status, and respond by instituting even stricter, authoritarian governments – a trend that can be seen from Canada and America to Australia and even France.
These privileged few not only demand, and eat, vast quantities of cat food (wealth) but lately insist that the mice cut back and pay more for mouse food so that they, the cats, can wallow in their excesses.
I encourage you to read, and listen to, the tale of Mouseland, and decide for yourselves if a government of cats can ever work for a population of mice. I want you to keep the allegory in mind when you buy that next tank of gas, that next bag of apples, or that next t-shirt from some Honduran maquiladora whose workers can barely afford the potable water they need to keep them alive.
I also want you to read Mouseland before you vote in November. I know I will, if I get the opportunity (to vote, that is). As Tommy Douglas noted, you can lock up a mouse (or a human), but you can’t lock up an idea. "