Herman Daly - Modernizing Henry George
Daly: Economists have traditionally considered nature to be infinite relative to the economy, and therefore not scarce, and therefore properly priced at zero. But the biosphere is now scarce, and becoming more so every day as a result of growth of its large and dependent subsystem, the macro-economy. As the macro-economy expands into the ecosystem it displaces what was there before, namely habitat of other species (and of indigenous and poor members of our own species).
(read the rest here)
Erich: This is the philosophy which underlies green economics - fair and frugal, ending poverty and preserving nature.
- Erich Jacoby-Hawkins's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Blogs are personal opinions, and may not reflect the position of the Green Party of Canada. For official party policy please visit the policy and press release sections.
Recent Comments
- Theodore Tadeson | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- Bram Kivenko | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- David Barclay | 09-Feb-2012
- 1 of 2171
- ››





Comments
Not quite right
I recall back in my university days (late 80's early 90's) that the environment was listed as a hidden cost. The idea of taxing use of it was commonly thought of but seen as too hard to achieve in most cases. Now, with modern computers having many times the power of 20 years ago we can measure pollution in many ways and it should be able to be taxed (from carbon taxes to taxing the amount coming out of smokestacks based on what comes out) thus covering off that hidden cost to society as a whole.
Economists aren't always ignoring the environment. Heck, some are even Green members :)
John Northey
Wellington-Halton Hills