EKOS Poll Seat Projection Gives One to the Greens

The Globe & Mail is reporting that in a  new poll conducted by EKOS (week of January 21/10), the Green Party is projected to win one seat if a Federal Election were held today.  While there is no mention of where that seat might be, the EKOS results indicate that we are at 15.3% in British Columbia, the highest anywhere in Canada.  This is largely consistent with weekly polling conducted by EKOS since the new year.  Overall, EKOS reports that we have dropped slightly in popular support, down to a still respectable 11.5% nationally (from a high of 13.4% during the week of January 7/10).  We are still trending slightly above where we were during the second part of last year.

What's unclear to me (and please, someone set me straight on this) is whether one of the major polls has ever predicted that we would win a seat in parliament should an election be held.  I can't seem to find this reference in the EKOS poll itself, which appears only to provide data related to provincial intentions (as the smallest geographic unit -- in other words, data is not at a riding-by-riding level).  However, the Globe must have received this data from somewhere (does anyone know), as they are reporting the EKOS has indicated the following breakdown:

Liberals - 117 seats

Conservatives - 114 seats

NDP - 28 seats

Bloc - 47 seats

Green - 1 seat

Independents - 1

This is good news, even though we always fare better in the EKOS polls than the other national polls.  We continue to trend better than we have fared for the last part of 2009 (although heading downwards slightly from two weeks ago, which might become problematic).  I'm satisfied that it appears that EKOS is predicting a Green seat in parliament (even if I can't find the actual data! I have to think that Jane Taber at the G&M is getting this from somewhere reliable, though, so I feel comfortable with what's being reported).  This is certainly a little something for us to continue to build on over the next little while.

What's also intersting is that this proragation issue appears to be sticking to the Conservatives, although I continue to be baffled that the electorate seems content to (largely) turn to the Liberals on this issue.  The NDP has been trending downward since late November, which surprises me, considering that they have been much more vocal about this than the Liberals have been.  I guess I'm just ticked that it appears to me that the Liberals haven't done a darn thing to earn this increase in support.  But that's just my little partisan opinion.

Enjoy.

 

P.S. I appear to have been scooped by David Barclay, who commented on one of my earlier blogs today regarding the latest figures from EKOS.  Here are David's thoughtful comments.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Electorate turning to Liberals

It's unfortunate, but not baffling. I think "Sean in Ottawa's" comments in this thread on babble explains what is happening: The NDP can now learn from the Liberals.

Perception is Reality

Majority of voters, especially those over 40 follow TV and newspaper 'media-branding' of parties:

"An 'NDPer' is a tax-and-spend socialist goody-goody that would bankrupt our country."

"The Green Party is mostly 'tree-hugging kids' who don't understand the way the world really works."

"The Conservatives are the brutal fiscal medicine we need to fix our economy."

"The Liberals have a weak leader and are divided. But once they 'learn their lesson' from the sponsorship scandal, they'll be ready to govern again."

To undo media-branding you need media exposure.

To be in the media limelight you need to make timely proposals that are 'newsworthy' and capture the imagination of the media and the population.

Respectfully, D. Scott Barclay

Ah, those pesky "newsworthy proposals"

Rather than re-state what I just wrote as part of another thread, here's a link to my issues with the Party's structure which I believe puts our Party in a difficult position when it comes to responding to urgent matters of public interest.  My comments were originally published under David Barclay's "Who's Standing Up for Democracy?" post, so if you've already read my remarks there, don't bother with the link.

"Sudbury" Steve May