No Consequences for Avoiding Environmental Assessment Law: Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Red Chris Mine in B.C.
WTF?!?! The Toronto Star is reporting this morning that the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the Federal Government failed to adequately assess environmental issues with the Red Chris mining project in British Columbia...but that it’s ok for the project to proceed because the complainant in the matter, MiningWatch Canada, has no financial stake in the project.
So...does this mean that it’s ok to circumvent the requirements of the Federal Environmental Assessment Act as long as you’re only going to be called out by a company with a financial interest, and not just because...well, because not only does the law require an assessment, but because it’s the right thing to do?
I realize that this is an early report. I suspect this Decision is going to be another of the many things I’ve been adding to my ever-growing "to read" list. Unless someone here can explain.
- Steve May's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Blogs are personal opinions, and may not reflect the position of the Green Party of Canada. For official party policy please visit the policy and press release sections.
Recent Comments
- Theodore Tadeson | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- Bram Kivenko | 09-Feb-2012
- Rick Shea | 09-Feb-2012
- David Barclay | 09-Feb-2012
- 1 of 2171
- ››





Comments
Re: Red Chris Mine