Vampire power: How to Save $6 Billion a year at no cost

Shattering the Myth: Achieving Kyoto Targets will cost us Part II

Ironically during Earth Day week, the federal Conservative Minister of the Environment testified before the Senate Environmental Committee that meeting the Kyoto carbon emissions targets would “manufacture a recession.” Headlines following his testimony read, “Baird accused of scare tactics on Kyoto.”

This is the second post in a multi-part series, highlighting hard business cases will dispel this as pure myth.

Vampire Power
Electrical devices that are plugged in 24 hours a day are using between two and 20 watts – even when the device is fully charged or off. This is called “vampire power,” “phantom power” or “standby power.” When your TV is "off" – the power supply is still drawing power so that when you flick the on button on your remote it instantly turns on.

With the proliferation of digital devices there are four billions of power supplies sold world wide every year.

Standby power accounts for 10 per cent of US residential electricity consumption, or more than US$6 billion annually. In 2004, “vampire power” consumed almost 130 million MWh – equal to the output of 36 power plants. And here’s the kicker: manufacturers could build power supplies for electronic devices that draw as little as 0.25 watts — at no additional cost, or at most 25 cents per unit.

In 1999 residential phantom power consumed more electricity in California than all refrigerators in homes in the state! (see image with blog or download full PowerPoint slide under attachments below).

So California imposed regulations on standby consumption for a number of devices. Devices sold in California as of January 2006, could consume no more than three watts in standby mode; this fell to 0.75 watts in 2007 and will drop to 0.5 watts in January 2008.

Applying this standard in all OECD nations would reduce CO2 emissions by the same amount as removing 18 million cars from roads -- at no cost!!

Potential savings in the US? $US6 billion a year – by drastically reducing vampire power which is entirely wasted! And at what cost? Nothing. Nada. Zero. Zip. In other words, $6 billion of savings a year for FREE.

So when a politician tells you that meeting the Kyoto targets will cost us too much, tell them to read this blog.

Source: www.energy.ca.gov/commission/commissioners/rosenfe... slide #27

For Shattering the Myth: Achieving Kyoto Targets will cost us Part I go to http://www.greenparty.ca/en/node/1384

Stay tuned for part III: Hybridizing Taxi Fleets: How to save $50 Billion in North America over a decade for FREE.

AttachmentSize
Vampire Power.ppt97.5 KB

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

power bar to shut off device works in teh mean time.

Lambton Kent Middlesex EDA (SW Ontario)
We have several power bars around the house that in addition to providing surge protection allow us to totally stop phantom power drains, just flip the switch.

Flipping the switch also provides extra protection from more distant lightning strikes, particularly with a surge protector on the load side of the switch. We do not get those extra benefits from having low wattage phantom usage.

My son is part of a projectr ready to spring on the world a laptop computer that will use less than one watt in full use, at night, and as little as 0.3 watts in daytime. It will come equipped with a crank generator that will allow users to rechage the battery by hand every week or a small solar panel. Incidentally this unit will initially be for free distribution in 3rd world countries, not for us to buy. But my point here is that we can do amazing things with very little energy if that is what we have to do.

Lambton Kent Middlesex EDA (SW Ontario)

Fix my clocks, vampire slayer!

I am stuck in a dilemma.

Apparently, several of my appliances (TV, VCR, DVD, stereo) are "power vampires", sucking excess electricity even when shut off.

But if I follow the prescription - unplug them when off (by shutting down the power bar), very annoying things happen:

- my VCRs forget what time it is, and I have to spend several minutes re-setting them before I program to record. Since I usually set up to record as I'm running out the door, this delay is not appreciated.

- my TV forgets all my cable channels, so I have to do a channel scan when I power back on to re-load them all. This takes several minutes. Same is true for my VCRs.

- my stereo (the only appliance with a display clock) loses the time and has to be reset. I use that clock, it's in a handy place. Plus, it goes into demo mode whenever it loses power and comes back on - annoying.

- my DVD player - actually, no problems there so far as I know. But if I had special 5-channel Dolby stereo or a wide-screen TV or whatnot, I'd probably have to reset all the DVD options whenever I powered up.

So for me it's not so simple as just switching off the power bar. Instead, we need appliances that can remember things without needing to draw so much power when 'off' - perhaps with a little rechargable battery, or just using a tiny trickle instead of what they draw now.

Until we either legislate away they wasteful standbys, or at least post big warning labels on new appliances, I'm stuck. And no, I'm not about to buy a new TV or VCR just to deal with this, thanks - it's not enough energy to be economical at today's prices.

Erich Jacoby-Hawkins
Barrie, ON

Erich Jacoby-Hawkins, Barrie ON Although I'm on Shadow Cabinet (Ecological Fiscal Reform), the views I express here are my own and should not be construed to represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada - www.erichthegreen.ca

Microwave consumes more power in standby than in use!!

Hard to believe but an average microwave will consume more power when not in use -- powering the digital clock but the real culprit is the power supply which consumes electricity day and night. In standby mode the average microwave will consume more energy than it will use to heat food.

The solution isn't to unplug it and then have to reprogram the clock each time you plug it back in -- the solution is federal legislation like California has requiring that all devices sold in Canada meet California's standard. By supporting California's existing standard it becomes the de facto North American standard which then appliance makers will likely meet for every state because they 1) can and 2) they know they will have to meet it everywhere sooner or later.

And therefore in the absence of leadership federally the state of California has led the way in changing the world (or at least North America).

Jim

Microwave power consumption

Hi Jim,

This is very insightful -- but we need to communicate clearly to avoid misunderstandings. Basically, in the ~23 hours, 59 minutes per day that a microwave is not in use, it will use more energy than in the 1 minute per day that it's on. Similar statements can likely be made for other electronics appliances with clocks or a standby mode.

Here at home, our recently-purchased microwave consumes 3W while in standby, and about 1200W when in use. In 24 hours it will consume 72 Watt-hours of energy. This is equivalent to the energy consumed in 216 seconds of operation. (0.06 hours)

Cheers,

Matthew

Matthew Klippenstein, P.Eng.
Burnaby-New Westminster
matthew.klippenstein@gmail.com

Matthew Klippenstein, P.Eng. Burnaby-New Westminster matthew.klippenstein@gmail.com

We can have sub one watt control systems

Lambton Kent Middlesex EDA (SW Ontario)
I mentioned a computer that is in the works that uses less than a watt. Think of that as a very sophisticated control system that could be simplified to run all day long on one watt minute.

We can stop concerning ourself whether that one wat minute may be more or less than the device it controls uses in a tuypical day., because it just does not matter.
My computer battery has been working for 6 years, and that with the power bar in use. This is not a big problem.
Flash memory can be incorporated in a design to store settings and a lot more.

We should demand that our devices can be left unplugged with no inconveniences, not only to save power, but to protect them from voltage surges.

But how do we cut out the power used to keep a wireless skype phone available round the clock when it is used only an average hour a day?

Lambton Kent Middlesex EDA (SW Ontario)