Election Alarm: Highest State of Preparedness Required. Feb 20 Poll Puts Conservatives in Majority Territory
I believe we have to urgently prepare for an election – and want to outline a few compelling reasons why I feel one is very likely.
While some media pundits and Green Party bloggers suggest an election is unlikely – such as Jim Johnston’s blog on this site (http://www.green.ca/en/node/3905) – I'm putting forward arguments as to why it’s very likely.
The election just got more likely with the release of a Strategic Counsel poll on Feb 20 showing the Conservatives 12% ahead of the Liberals. The poll also shows the Green Party as the third most popular party in Canada at 12% -- tied with the NDP. Below as an attachment are the highlights of the research in my opinion -- available for download. Or you can get the full poll at http://www.thestrategiccounsel.com/our_news/polls/...
The bottom line is this: being unprepared is to be vulnerable. We must plan for the election to be triggered in March 2007. If we are given a reprieve – great – but we must be prepared. I know bloggers like Jim Johnston believe in being prepared too.
Reasons why the Conservatives want an election:
1) The Liberal leadership candidates are still millions of dollars in debt collectively from their leadership election. These debts must be retired by law, and so the Liberal leadership candidates are competing with the party itself for financial resources. The Liberal Party used to rely on large donors to fund its’ operations. In 2005 the Liberals received more $5,200 donations than all the other parties combined and multiplied by two! The Conservatives Accountability Act limited donations to a central party to $1,100 a year. This was aimed squarely at the Liberal’s fundraising.
By contrast the Conservatives have focused on direct mail and building their party lists relying on more donors at smaller average amounts. As a result the Conservatives have raised four times as much as the Liberals in 2007.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amount . . . . . . . Elections Canada
Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raised . . . . . . . . Rebates Rec’d
Conservatives . . . .$17,012,049 . . . . . . .$10,218,122
Liberals. . . . . . . . . . $4,906,215 . . . . . . . $8,517,047
NDP . . . . . . . . . . . . .$3,980,088 . . . . . . . $4,923,793
Bloc Québécois . . . . . $465,295 . . . . . . . $2,953,216
Green Party . . . . . . .$1,005,631 . . . . . . . $1,262,640
Source: Elections Canada and Hill Times http://www.thehilltimes.ca/html/index.php?display=...
The good news for the Green Party is that for the first time ever we raised more than $1 million in 2007 – which was more than double what the Bloc raised.
2) Dealing Death Blow to Dion. Pundits point to the fact that no party in majority territory and that all the old line, traditional parties have seen their support fall since the 2006 election – and cite this as a reason to expect no election. This thinking is deeply flawed.
The Conservatives want an election just to bankrupt the Liberals and deal a death blow to Dion. Parties don’t receive their 50% central party campaign subsidy for up to 9 months following an election. With the Liberals already in debt from their leadership race their December 2006 leadership race, the Liberal Party is going to have to borrow $15,000,000 to run their election campaign. The Conservative goal would be to win another minority.
A loss for the Liberals would deal a death blow to Dion’s leadership – and if not a death blow then it would do deadly damage to his leadership.
If Dion resigned it would throw the party back into another leadership race that would draw millions of dollars from what would go to the party to leadership candidates.
A leadership race would pose unique challenges for the Liberals. Leadership candidates by definition have to distinguish themselves from each other – the Liberal message in this period would seem confused, uncertain – while by contrast the Conservatives with Harper’s authoritarian, micro-managing focus would seem consistent.
If Dion didn’t resign there would be many knives out for him. Either way it would throw the party into chaos and disarray for at least another year.
Meanwhile the Conservative would replenish their financial resources, focus on governing the country, and wait for the most opportune time to call an election – perhaps even engineer a crisis before the Liberals selected anew leader.
As a Hill Times article points out today, the Conservatives have put $27-million in their coffers in 2007, have a 17,000 square-foot state-of-the-art operational campaign war room outfitted with a TV studio, 75% of their candidates are nominated and their campaign ads are in the can.
3) Candidates Nominated. Another election readiness alarm is the number of candidates nominated. It’s clear both the Conservative – expect and are ready for an election.
Party .. . . . . . . . . . . . . %
Bloc Québécois . . . . . .85%
Conservatives . . . . . .81%
Liberals. . . . . . . . . . . 70%
Green Party . . . . . . . 55%
NDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53%
Sources: http://www.punditsguide.ca/2008/02/comings-and-goi... -- this by the way is a great blog with info on parties' nominations. I talked with the Director of Organizing for the Bloc on Friday and the 40 MPs have their seats protected and they are only searching for 10 candidates. So this puts them as the most prepared of all parties -- which is logical as they the fewest ridings relative to the number of seats they run in.
Here's the link to a great story on this http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=38a9b4e9-6b3e-...
The good news for the Green Party is we have never had as many candidates nominated pre-writ as we do now -- 171 -– and 2) we are ahead of the NDP. The bad news is we are behind the Conservatives and Liberals.
4) Momentum. Elections generate their own momentum which in some cases becomes inevitable. Everyone books their campaign busses. The planes, orders the signs.
5) In a Minority Nobody is in Charge and Nobody Really Knows. In a minority situation thing can change very fast.
6) Leadership. The Conservatives have been hammering at one thing since Dion was election. Leadership. They have run nasty attack ads ad nausea. And surprise, surprise on the leadership questions in polling Dion has at times tracked below Jack Layton. This is leading to two things 1) the Conservatives will have a whole campaign aimed at leadership and hope to deal a death blow to Dion – and 2) It has given Jack Layton and the NDP illusions of being able to replace the Liberals as the opposition. This has led Layton and the NDP to commit to spending the full $18.5 million spending limit the first ever for the NDP. The only good news here for the Green Party is the NDP is the most inefficient political party in Canada in terms of turning their spending into votes. In the 2006 election the NDP had to spend $5.22 to win each vote whereas the Green Party was at $1.37 and in the Ontario
7) The US Economy is Wobbling Badly and May Tank. This in turn would have a cascading effect in Canada – and Harper may want to go to the polls while things are more rosy.
8) Sastisfaction with Prime Minister Harper’s government is surprisingly strong. From a Montreal Gazette article: But satisfaction in Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government remains high - 55 per cent across the country - while Liberal leader Stéphane Dion is at the bottom of the pack when Canadians are asked who would be the best prime minister.
Harper leads when Canadians are asked who would be the best prime minister. Nationally, Harper's score is 32 per cent, compared with NDP leader Jack Layton at 18 per cent. Dion sits at 15. Source: http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.h...
Signs we are About to Enter an Election
I really, really want to stress that we have to go into high election alert. The party has to move into the highest state of election readiness possible asap. The good news is that the party has never been more prepared at the grass roots – we’ve never had more candidates nominated pre-writ than we do now. But we have to get ready for the government to fall in March.
Please, please, please get every nomination possible underway ASAP. The only exception is where there is a strong reason not to – and we cited the case of Ottawa Centre -- where Elizabeth wants to make sure the riding is kept open for David Chernushenko.
Signs Conservatives are Preparing
1. Conservatives have printing Thousands of election signs. At Lakeshore Printing, Jeff Brownridge, saw thousands upon thousands of Conservative signs being printed when he was in ordering signs for Chris Tindal’s by-election campaign. The company admitted to him that the Cons have placed their order.
2. Lobbyist Quits jobs to go on political staff of Conservatives for Jay Hill on the Hill. Yaroslav Baran, who was lobbyist at Earnscliffe Strategy Group, he deregistered as a lobbyist in late January and quit his job. He joined Conservative House leader Jay Hill's office as his new chief of staff, clearing the way for his key organizational involvement in the campaign paving his way to take up running communications in the Conservatives' war room as he has done in the previous two campaigns. So Conservatives ban on lobbyists in their war room won't affect Baran. Source: http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.h......
3. The Conservative strategy has been to dare the Liberals to bring the government down. In the last session they put forward a number of confidence motions. The Liberals have backed down and are appearing weak – but you can only cry wolf so many times – and when the Liberal strategist have been hammered enough they’ll pull the plug on the government.
Signs that Liberals are Preparing
One of our campaign managers has found out from a counterpart that the Liberals plan to vote against the Conservatives on at least one issue of confidence – can’t say which – but the government could very well fall.
Sign that the NDP is Preparing
From the Hill Times article cited above: "NDP Leader Jack Layton is holding conference calls with nominated candidates on a daily basis and senior campaign staffers are holding conference call strategy sessions every day. More than 100 staffers are expected to work in the NDP campaign headquarters during the election."
There are many other indications that there will be an election – but can’t reveal the insights for fear of compromising our sources – so we are sworn to silence. Mums the word.
While some people might say – “Oh I just saw something on the front page of the Globe today where Bob Rae was urging Dion not to bring the government down and force an election.”
The situation will the government fall/won’t it is tailor made for getting media – this story is more about Bob Rae getting a headline above the fold on the front page of the Globe to help him in Toronto Centre. Why was it Rae who urged Dion and not Ignatieff? Simple this is a ruse to get front page publicity for Rae -- it's so transparent. But it's not about the election what's really behind it is Rae needing the publicity -- because there are a lot of Liberals in the riding who are not so committed to voting for Rae. There is a reason after all that he didn't win the leadership of the Liberal Party.
Every nomination that is ready to go should go now asap – unless there is a strong reason not to.
- Jim Harris's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Blogs are personal opinions, and may not reflect the position of the Green Party of Canada. For official party policy please visit the policy and press release sections.





Comments
Being prepared is just prudent
Regardless on whether or not you agree with Jim's assessment of the current political landscape, we still need to get prepared.
Members reading this should be asking themselves the following questions:
1. Who's my Green Party candidate?
2. If I have no candidate, how can I be the candidate?
3. If I can't be the candidate, who can I find to be the candidate?
The sooner we get 307 candidates identified and registered, the sooner we can start fundraising for them. The sooner we start fundraising, the sooner we can order signs and flyers. The sooner we have signs and flyers, the sooner we can start organizing teams to go out doorknocking to distribute them. The sooner we get out doorknocking, the sooner we start identifying our supporters. The more supporters we identify, the more likely we are to win that riding.
We have demonstrated that we can field a full slate of candidates. Now the emphasis is to start fielding full slates of campaign teams for pushing those campaigns over 10%, over 20% and over 40% to start electing MPs.
In order to have a campaign that can win, the organizing needs to start NOW!
Mark Taylor
Alberta Representative, GPC Federal Council
Financial Agent, Macleod
Mark Taylor (Cypress Hills - Grasslands)
http://ReportonGreens.blogspot.com
This statement is purely my own opinion and no way is to be mistaken for the viewpoints of the party
Conservatives Almost at Majority Support Levels
Green Party: Third Most Popular Party in Canada, according to poll CTV and Globe and Mail poll by Strategic Counsel.
Image from http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNew...
Prepare, prepare, prepare!
The Conservatives at 39% -- almost within majority territory -- while the Liberals are at 27% according front page Globe and Mail article features the results of the most recent Strategic Counsel poll. The Greens are in 3rd place with 12% of the vote -- tied with the NDP, while the Bloc has 10%.
The CTV story points out that in Ontario, the Conservatives have overtaken the Liberals for the first time since July 2006. Current support in Ontario (change from Jan. 10-13 poll in brackets):
Conservatives: 42 per cent (+5)
Liberals: 34 per cent (-5)
Green Party: 13 per cent (-1)
NDP: 11 per cent (-1)
Being 2% ahead of the NDP in the most voter-rich province in Canada is a huge accomplishment -- congratulations to all members who have been working so hard speading the Green message!!
Here's the relative support for parties in Quebec
Bloc Quebeccois . 40%
Conservatives 22%
Liberals . . 19%
Green Party 14%
NDP . . . . . . 5%
When asked, "Which political party is best abel to deal with the environment and climate change?" Canadians trust the Green Party pretty much two to one over any old-line, traditional party:
Green Party 30%
Liberals . . 17%
Conservatives 16%
NDP . . . . . . 10%
Bloc . . . . . . 2%
When asked, "Which political party has the best new ideas for Canada?" Canadians rank the Green Party as equal to the NDP and Liberals:
Green Party 12%
Liberals . . 13%
Conservatives 24%
NDP . . . . . . 12%
Bloc . . . . . . 2%
We have to expect the government to fall in March.
Above, at the foot of the main post you can download as an attachment the highlights of this research -- or you can get the full set of tables at http://www.thestrategiccounsel.com/our_news/polls/...
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080221.POLL21/TPStory/National
Headlines versus content
Thanks for the update, Jim. We will keep on keeping on!
It is interesting to note that the graphic they used in the article (reproduced above) boldly shows (+3) for the Conservatives and (-3) for the Liberals, but somehow neglects the (+2) for the Greens. I guess some news makes better news than other news.
Jim Johnston,
Lambton-Kent-Middlesex
Opinions expressed are my own.
A Great Site for Scoop on Parties' nomination progress
This site underestimates the number of Green Party candidates nominated -- we actually have 171 candidates nominated -- so we're ahead of the NDP but perhaps they haven't all been listed yet on our web site. I will get to the bottom of the discrepancy -- but in the meantime she has some great tid bits on nominations. See http://www.punditsguide.ca/2008/02/comings-and-goi...
Conservatives Have Nominated 248 Candidates
See http://www.punditsguide.ca/ and scroll down to the February 22 blog entry.
The fact that the Conservatives have nominated 248 candidates 9s a warning sign. Because the Conservatives -- I predict -- will put something so poisonous in one of the upcoming confidence motions that the Liberals will have to either 1) swallow it and be called weak or have supporters become disillusioned with the party or 2) will have to vote against it. Either way the Conservatives win.
The fact that the Conservatives have 81% of their canidates nominated should be a warning in terms of the Green Party acheiving the highest ever state of election readiness.
Conservative Flurry of Appointments Impending Election Signal
Yet one more signal of the Conservatives preparing to go to the polls. In Saturday's Globe and Mail the article begins "A flurry of federal appointments took place across a wide number of government departments this week as election speculation simmered in Ottawa."
Read mroe at http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM...
Pressure Off Only Temporarily
We now know that the government won't fall in the next week or two on the budget -- and it likely won't fall after that on Afghanistan -- as the Conservatives and Liberals have reached an understanding.
The point still remains that the Conservatives have developed an appetite for putting poison pills in legislation -- declaring it a motion of confidence -- and forcing the Liberals to swallow the poison by supporting the Bill -- or looking weak by abstaining -- or having to have MPs miss the vote.
Regardless of the outcome, the Conservatives get what they want. But at some point Liberal strategists or Dion will tire of this game and call the Conservatives bluff and the Government will fall. There will be a long list of confidence motions the Conservatives will bring forward in the coming weeks and months.
In a minority situation, remember, no one is in charge.
So while the government falling in the next few weeks seems unlikely -- I've heard rumblings of the Conservatives being brought down in April resulting in a May or June election.
Pull the plug, PM dares Dion
Pull the plug, PM dares Dion Screams the headline of a three quarter page article in the Toronto Star today (Feb 28).
The subtitle reads: Force an election if you don't like budget, Haper taunts opposition leader.
Here are the first few paragraphs:
Prime Minister Stephen Harper is taunting Stéphane Dion, saying if the Liberal leader doesn't like the Conservative budget, he should vote against it and force an election.
Just a day after saying his party would grudgingly accept the latest budget, Dion yesterday was complaining about the Tories' management of the economy.
But his complaints were met with a sharp rebuttal from Harper, who all but dared the Liberals to force an election over the financial blueprint unveiled this week.
"I want to talk about leadership, vision and credibility. Let me just say to the leader of the Opposition, when he comes and makes ferocious attacks on a budget that he has every intention of allowing to pass he simply has no credibility," Harper said in the Commons.
For the full article see http://www.thestar.com/News/FederalBudget/article/...
How many weeks/months of these headlines do you think the Liberals will accept? We are going to have an election.
Liberals May Bring Down Government over Cadman affair
Yesterday's Globe and Mail (Feb 29) editorial entitled "Just what was Cadman offered?" begins: "Allegations that two Conservative Party officials offered Independent British Columbia MP Chuck Cadman a "bribe" in exchange for voting to bring down the Liberal government in May of 2005 would, if true, constitute a serious crime that strikes at the heart of Canada's democracy." (emphasis added by me).
This issues has traction -- and strikes at the heart of Mr. Harper's projected Mr. Clean image -- and the pledge that the Conservatives will clean up corruption.
This was the whole basis on which Harper and the Conservatives campaigned on in 2006. And now it turns out with Mulroney accepting envelopes stuffed with hundreds of thousands of cash in them and Harper's team offering a bribe of million dollar life insurance policy to incent dying Chuck Cadman to bring down the Liberal minority government of the day -- that the Conservatives are no different than the Liberals were with Adscam.
Liberals hint at toppling government over Cadman affair
Steve Rennie
Canadian Press
February 29, 2008 at 6:50 PM EST
OTTAWA — The spectre of an alleged financial offer to a dying MP hovered over Parliament Hill on Friday as some Liberals hinted they might topple the government over the prime minister's purported role in the alleged affair.
For the full article see http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM...
At least us Alberta Greens will get a couple of days off
Seeing that election day is Monday, March 3rd and the NDP amendment motion is Friday, March 7th... we Alberta Greens will get a couple of days off before we are back on the campaign trail.
We won't need much rest anyway... we'll be riding a emotional and political high after we elect a couple of Green MLAs!!!!!
Mark Taylor
Alberta Representative, GPC Federal Council
Financial Agent, Macleod
Campaign Manager for Sean Maw, Calgary-Varsity
Mark Taylor (Cypress Hills - Grasslands)
http://ReportonGreens.blogspot.com
This statement is purely my own opinion and no way is to be mistaken for the viewpoints of the party
corruption type C, corruption type L
"that the Conservatives are no different than the Liberals were"
But there are important differences: Liberals apparently virtually institutionalized "sustainable" self-finance, self-justifying as being the only institution capable of keeping the country whole; Cons. show such an unsubtle hand at their alleged corruption (& definite misgovernance) that they almost make the Liberals' point! Liberal presumptions of institutional centrality, whatever putative past validity, are passé(es), and Cons. have plentifully shown themselves to be inadequate at any depth of governance required both by the country's culture of rule of law as well as the grave issues of our day. Neither must govern any longer, but potentially most serious would be a repeat Cons. minority that could act largely as a majority, especially because of those grave issues. But the country will deserve what it gets: bring 'em down, & if they're returned, they're returned. The Liberals are spot on detecting political blood in the water with this one. GPC must keep reducing them all by putting out its message of difference. Seats or no for now, the green influence is had. And let's forcefully put electoral reform front & centre in a campaign, it is the appropriate political moment.
I hope to assist some more with a local by-election campaign or two. The better the GPC showing even here, the more important GPC'll seem whenever the plug is pulled on the Cons. (now even truer to that abbreviated epithet).
0 points
.... and your message still appears on the front page?
To have a reserved space, fine, I can live with that (although others may not). But if you got 0 points, then your previous messages with a higher pointing score should appear in the front.
----
http://www.julienlamarche.ca - julien.lamarche@gmail.com
The 4 electoral systems: http://preview.tinyurl.com/5hzoxl
Here's something everyone can do
Preparation is the key to success. No matter what your role in the Green Party, or if you are just browsing through and reading this blog, here's what you can do to help.
Use the buttons at the top of this page, click on the "find your riding" button, and see who the contact person is. Then email them or call them, and find out what stage your riding is at. If you have no candidate, get a list from your provincial organizer and start calling. Ask people for ideas, think about well known community leaders, and put out the feelers.
And while you are doing this, think about what role you can play in supporting the cause. Could you be a candidate? Could you be a campaign manager? Could you be the official agent for a campaign? Could you handle some media relations calls? Organize the sign crews, hand out flyers, collect some nomination signatures, ask people for a small donation, or a big donation?
If not you, who? If not now, when?
Jim Johnston,
Lambton-Kent-Middlesex
(Blog edited)
PS. If your riding is in good shape, have a look at the ridings next door, too!
Opinions expressed are my own.
Riding information inaccurate on GPC site
Jim (Johnston), the riding information on this site frequently does not list candidates, even where nominated candidates exist. I am a case in point, but I know there are more. I have yet to receive my letter from Ms. May confirming me as the candidate, and I know at least one other person is also waiting. Possibly after confirmation the site will show which ridings have candidates. Until then, those of us nominated are trying to convince our EDAs to order signs with our names on and otherwise prepare for election, without knowing if we will be replaced at some point.
Brian Gordon
Nominated Candidate, Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca
Green Party of Canada
Trained Presenter
An Inconvenient Truth
People - Planet - Prosperity
The New Green Economy
Jim, who's missing a candidate?
Jim, please post - or ask provincial organizers to do so - the list of ridings that are missing candidates. Have it sorted by province, if not provincial region.
Wikipedia already has the info, but it's not a simple list, so it's harder to pick out the missing candidates, plus its not necessarily up to date. The point is, we don't loose a strategic advantage by spreading that information on-line.
----
http://www.julienlamarche.ca - julien.lamarche@gmail.com
The 4 electoral systems: http://preview.tinyurl.com/5hzoxl
Great idea Julien
We're working on it -- stimulated by your suggestion. Thanks!
Keep up the great blogging.
Jim
Election or not, just do what you would normally do
Raise money, build your team and get your systems in place. If Jim's right, you need to get it done. If Jim's wrong and we get an election in the fall, you still have to get it done now. The other parties sure are!
A nice chart of relative party campaign finances
Sorry, Jim, I missed your post and did something similar myself. I have been a 'hawk' on election readiness, as you know, but I think that Dion's mumbles today about being able to support the budget are very significant.
My contribution to this discussion is a luverly chart of party finance wot I did using the same numbers you found. I can't post it as a comment, but look in my own blog.
The Conservatives have done an incredible job raising donations ($17 million), almost double what the other parties did COMBINED. They can spend the maximum legal amount on the campaign, and PAY CASH.
As you say, the Liberals could borrow $15 million, but they only have about $13 million in annual cashflow. They have overhead to pay for, so it might take them two years to pay off this debt. Elections Canada requires that the debt be repaid in 18 months.
Economics of the Liberals Paying their Inevitable Election Debt
Hey John
If the Liberals run an $18.5 million campaign -- and that's made up of $3.5 million cash and $15 million of borrowing -- they will get the 50% central campaign subsidy six months later -- worth $9.25 million.
In this scenario then they would only be left with $5.75 million of debt six months after the election.
So it probably would take them at least a year to pay this off -- and it would be easier over 18 months. But they would be able to pay it off in 18 months.
Jim
18-month myth
I belive the 18-month payback is a myth. It used to be that one could get personal, unsecured, "handshake" loans to your EDA, party, or candidate. By 18 months, those loans would either have to be repaid in full or would be deemed contributions - which would prevent later repayment and likely exceed contribution limits.
I thought this sort of loan was now forbidden, that only loans from recognized financial institutions are allowed, but can't find anything about that in the rules. Such loans would fall under the exemption: "is the subject of a binding agreement to pay" that disregards the 18-month limit.
It's good to pay off loans as soon as possible, but 18 months is not an official deadline - at least, not that I can find in the Canada Elections Act.
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins
Barrie, ON
The views I express on this blog are purely my own and should not be construed to represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada - the same goes for all other people's posts & comments.
Erich Jacoby-Hawkins, Barrie ON - although I'm on Cabinet (Nat'l Rev. and Ecol. Fiscal Reform), views here are my own and may not reflect official GPC positions. Please visit www.ErichtheGreen.ca
Riding Information
Here's the deal on getting your photo and bio on the ridings page (note this info has been circulated multiple times). You get your photo and bio put up if you have been nominated (or appointed where there is no EDA) AND you have submitted a COMPLETE candidate application.
Once the application is received, along with the photo and bio, we can screen you. When the leader has reviewed the information and nothing is amiss, you get the leader's endorsement letter. This is about as minimal as it gets compared to the processes in place in other parties. No one is a candidate until they've been screened and endorsed and no one is screened until we get an application. Organizers have been tearing their hair out trying to get candidates to send in their applications. And a complete application is a small miracle. Mostly they're not.
A new process was implemented before Christmas. No one goes into a nomination contest without having submitted an application and receiving the leader's endorsement. This is the process other parties use and it avoids situations where media show up at a nomination contest only to reveal that the local pedophile has been nominated.
If you've submitted your application and are wondering what's up, contact Mark Kersten, Ridings Co-ordinator. He can tell you what's missing on your application. All the contact information for the organizing staff is on the web site under Contact Us.
The best way to ensure you get your endorsement letter and your info on the ridings page is to submit a complete candidate application. The organizing staff would rather be involved in helping candidates than chasing down paperwork.
Thank you to everyone who has submitted a complete application.
Sharon Labchuk
Director of Organizing
Corrections to Sharon
Sharon is correct about the process once an EDA has nominated a candidate. Bio, photos, screening, endorsement, etc. Get that paperwork in, we may be facing an election in March.
But I suspect, as a member of the GPC Federal Council, that Sharon is mistaken about the rest of her post.
There is no "new process" that I'm aware of. The paragraph about "No one goes into a nomination contest without having submitted an application and receiving the leader's endorsement" is clearly not correct. That is a centrist approach, and contrary to Green principles, and, more important, contrary to the GPC constitution.
Sharon, as our chief organizer, is very busy, and has perhaps mis-spoken.
Per the GPC constitution, Bylaw 5, EDAs nominate their candidates as they see fit and the leader endorses, or doesn't endorse the nominated candidate. A non-endorsement of an EDA's choice would require a 3/4 vote of council, which would be difficult to obtain.
Correction to John
Actually the Bylaw says a 2/3's, ratification vote by Council is required. This means that the Leader has the ability to shut-down a candidate immediately without having to wait for Council to get around to holding a vote (an endemic problem in the past.) And a 2/3s vote is not that hard to get in a situation like this.
As for the screening process, it would be a very odd EDA indeed that decided that a person who failed the test would be suitable candidate---especially as this would be guaranteed to result in their candidate being vetoed by the Leader.
Quality control is hardly "contrary to Green principles". This is especially true in a situation where there are many very weak EDAs with very few members. The problem that the head office is attempting to deal with is the creation of "fiefdoms". That is, areas where the first people to set up an EDA aren't interested (or able) to attract other members of their community to get involved with the party, and as a result develop an eccentric local culture that is out-of-sync with the membership in the rest of the country.
Whomever is "first on the ground" in any volunteer organization has a huge impact on who does or doesn't join at a later date. This means that the principle of "grassroots democracy" has to supported by a delicate balancing act where the head office respects the opinions of the existing membership while also defending the rights of potential members who would like to get involved by don't feel like they would be welcomed by the existing local organization.
"There is always an easy solution to every human problem--neat, plausible, and wrong." H.L. Mencken
Quite right on the 2/3 vote,
Quite right on the 2/3 vote, Bill.
I (and other councillors) are not concerned about screening out "pedophiles". That's a red herring. How is EM going to know who's a pedophile?
The GPC has a constitution which leaves the nomination process entirely in the hands of the EDA.
I'm sure there are weak or even dysfunctional EDAs out there (though I haven't seen any personally). But giving the leader/organizing team arbitrary power over nominations will not fix that.
I enjoyed your post about "participatory democracy" and I don't think many Greens will be swayed by the argument that "this is how other parties do it".
No, I'm not mistaken
This is the process we've been using for some time. No mistake.
I see what you mean
John:
As you said before, I hope that Sharon mis-spoke in haste. I have no problem with the campaign team suggesting a checklist for candidates that the EDA can work though for prospective candidates, with a suggestion that people who fail any of these criteria can expect to not get their papers signed by the Leader after they are nominated. But that is different from saying that the candidates have to be pre-endorsed by the leader. The former situation is not arbitrary but objective; whereas the latter does sound arbitrary. In this case, the role of the Federal Council is to protect the constitution from the authority of the leader creeping towards a Presidential system.
But I would disagree with you about there being many dysfunctional EDAs. There certainly used to be a lot of poor EDAs and I suspect there still are a few, but you won't see many people say it in the open because it sounds elitist.
"There is always an easy solution to every human problem--neat, plausible, and wrong." H.L. Mencken
Conservative Number Inflated-But Still Good to be Prepared
This is some very interesting news on the polling front. I think we should take it all the more seriously given that the polling source is the Strategic Council which has been more in line with poll averages as compared to say Ipsos-Reid(See here for details: http://paulitics.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/one-of-t...
That being said I wouldn't base an entire analysis one poll, mistakes do happen.
I few things to remember, however. As has been stated before(was it on Jim's blog?) the Conservatives popularity in Alberta can push their support up a few percentage points overall but in no way influence their seat count(They still get 28 seats in Alberta regardless if they have 50% or 75% of the vote there).
I also see a very interesting picture shapeing up if there is an election. Polls have consistently shown four national parties (and the bloc) all with over 10% support. The NDP(and I assume the conservatives and liberals) have committed to spending up to the limit(and what will we do?). With that much base support I forsee some very close fourway races, and possibly even more fragmented in Quebec. I think this election will be won(or lost) on the slimmest of margins.
"People of good faith, figuring out where we are, not falling victim, making choices, based on our values, with the best available information." These views are my own and do not represent the official position of the Green Party of Canada.
Greens most heavily disfavoured too.
Lambton Kent Middlesex EDA (SW Ontario)
Which Party would Canadians never vote for?
Region
Canada Rest of
Quebec Canada* Ontario West
Feb 14-17 Feb 14-17 Feb 14-17 Feb 14-17 Feb 14-17
n= 1000 243 757 383 300
% % % % %
Green Party 30 38 28 25 29
NDP 27 16 31 33 31
Conservative Party 21 22 21 22 20
Liberal Party 16 19 15 15 16
Bloc Quebecois 1 3 - - -
DK/NA/Ref 18 17 18 18 17
We need not completely change ourselves to change this, but be aware that of all the parties we are the one most cited as 'would never vote for.
Note that we have moved ahead of NDP, long seen by Liberals and Conservatives as the communist threat.
It might be worth while examining just what is so off-putting about Green Party.
Interesting question - who wouldn't want to love us?
Hi, Don. That is an interesting question you pose. Is this high score due to people not knowing us? Or do they believe in Bairdsian eco-economic myths? Or simply being too new to be viable (people love winning parties, especially ones that have been around for a century or so)?
I could speculate until the cows come home, but the next time we are doing any polling out there, this would be an excellent area for further investigation. If one addresses the resistance in that group, the sky's the limit.
It could be they simply disagree with our philosophies. However, it is hard for me to imagine such a strong distaste for something that looks so good to me.
Jim Johnston,
Lambton-Kent-Middlesex
Opinions expressed are my own.
Conservatives goad Liberals to force election over RESP row
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/03/13/resp-mot...
In a minority situation there are many wild cards.